From: | Kouhei Kaigai <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Reworks of CustomScan serialization/deserialization |
Date: | 2016-03-29 03:00:36 |
Message-ID: | 9A28C8860F777E439AA12E8AEA7694F8011D7925@BPXM15GP.gisp.nec.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Robert Haas
> Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2016 10:54 AM
> To: Kaigai Kouhei(海外 浩平)
> Cc: Petr Jelinek; pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Reworks of CustomScan serialization/deserialization
>
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 9:36 PM, Kouhei Kaigai <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com> wrote:
> > I don't have a strong reason to keep these stuff in separate files.
> > Both stuffs covers similar features and amount of code are enough small.
> > So, the attached v4 just merged custom-node.[ch] stuff into extensible.
> >
> > Once we put similar routines closely, it may be better to consolidate
> > these routines.
> > As long as EXTNODENAME_MAX_LEN == CUSTOM_NAME_MAX_LEN, both features
> > have identical structure layout, so it is easy to call an internal
> > common function to register or find out a table of callbacks according
> > to the function actually called by other modules.
> >
> > I'm inclined to think to replace EXTNODENAME_MAX_LEN and
> > CUSTOM_NAME_MAX_LEN by NAMEDATALEN again, to fit structure layout.
>
> I don't think that we need both EXTNODENAME_MAX_LEN and
> CUSTOM_NAME_MAX_LEN; we can use EXTNODENAME_MAX_LEN for both. I'm
> opposed to using NAMEDATALEN for anything unrelated to the size of a
> Name. If it's not being stored in a catalog, it doesn't need to care.
>
OK, I adjusted the v4 patch to use EXTNODENAME_MAX_LEN for both.
The structure of hash entry was revised as follows, then registered via
an internal common function: RegisterExtensibleNodeEntry, and found out
via also an internal common function: GetExtensibleNodeEntry.
typedef struct
{
char extnodename[EXTNODENAME_MAX_LEN];
const void *extnodemethods;
} ExtensibleNodeEntry;
ExtensibleNodeMethods and CustomScanMethods shall be stored in
'extensible_node_methods' and 'custom_scan_methods' separatedly.
The entrypoint functions calls above internal common functions with
appropriate HTAB variable.
It will be re-usable if we would have further extensible nodes in the
future versions.
Thanks,
--
NEC Business Creation Division / PG-Strom Project
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
pgsql-v9.6-custom-scan-serialization-reworks.5.patch | application/octet-stream | 15.7 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2016-03-29 03:12:05 | Re: raw output from copy |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2016-03-29 01:59:58 | Re: Relation extension scalability |