From: | Alban Hertroys <haramrae(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | stan <stanb(at)panix(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: A GROUP BY question |
Date: | 2019-08-13 14:35:05 |
Message-ID: | 9A246E87-E81A-46FB-A69D-021698A9B731@gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
> On 13 Aug 2019, at 15:19, David G. Johnston <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, August 13, 2019, Alban Hertroys <haramrae(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > On 13 Aug 2019, at 13:10, stan <stanb(at)panix(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > select
> > project.proj_no ,
>
> Removed columns that get in the way of your desired result. You can’t have both details and the sum over them in a meaningful way.
>
> Sure you can, at least generally, with Window Functions/Expressions (i.e., OVER)
That’s why I added “in a meaningful way” ;)
Repeating the same SUM-result on every line in a group is not what I’d call a meaningful result; the SUM has no bearing on the detailed line and leads to the kind of mistakes I already mentioned.
(For the record; I do this kind of grouping in a hierarchical database regularly, but there the grouped SUM is at a different level in the hierarchy and I consider it thus sufficiently separated from the detail rows.)
Besides, I figured the OP was already struggling with the query syntax, adding window functions into the mix didn’t seem a good idea in the context. Possible?, sure, desirable?, I would say not.
Alban Hertroys
--
There is always an exception to always.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Luca Ferrari | 2019-08-13 14:48:43 | Re: Question on pgwatch |
Previous Message | Souvik Bhattacherjee | 2019-08-13 13:34:35 | Re: Bulk Inserts |