From: | Marcin Kowalski <kowalski(at)datrix(dot)co(dot)za> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pg_dump potential bug |
Date: | 2001-03-29 08:13:58 |
Message-ID: | 99uqrf$cmv$1@news.tht.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-bugs pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-sql |
Hi
Thanks for the help, in fact that is Exactly what is wrong. The pg_shadow
table has duplicated entries in it, I think I'm going to create a unique
index on it.
BTW I've migrated the entrie database to PG7.1RC1, running quite a big
search on the database basically involving a huge amount of selects.
Currently I'm curising at 1250 selects per second (simple select, no Joins)
from multiple tables with mutliple data, pretty fast I think. (But I still
have +- 10 Million to do :-) ).
ANyone have any ideas on how to improve performace, currently have indices
on key fields and am clustering (vacuum + vacuum analyze done)?? Are there
any command line parameters I can try to increase performance..??
Thanks in ADvance
MarCIn
Tom Lane wrote:
> Marcin Kowalski <kowalski(at)datrix(dot)co(dot)za> writes:
>> Is it possible that one of the system tables has been corrupted and shows
>> multiple entries for the tables?
>
> Come to think of it, this is a fairly likely behavior if you have
> multiple entries in pg_shadow with the same usesysid.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/search.mpl
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marcin Kowalski | 2001-03-29 08:35:06 | Re: pg_dump potential bug -UNIQUE INDEX on PG_SHADOW Dont!! HELP |
Previous Message | Natalya Pyalling | 2001-03-29 07:53:32 | Please Help Can not connect to any database |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marcin Kowalski | 2001-03-29 08:35:06 | Re: pg_dump potential bug -UNIQUE INDEX on PG_SHADOW Dont!! HELP |
Previous Message | Maurizio Ortolan | 2001-03-29 04:50:56 | Error in the date field (with NULL value...).Thanks! |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Phuong Ma | 2001-03-29 08:25:30 | inconsistent functionality with LIKE operator |
Previous Message | Natalya Pyalling | 2001-03-29 07:53:32 | Please Help Can not connect to any database |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marcin Kowalski | 2001-03-29 08:35:06 | Re: pg_dump potential bug -UNIQUE INDEX on PG_SHADOW Dont!! HELP |
Previous Message | Maurizio Ortolan | 2001-03-29 04:50:56 | Error in the date field (with NULL value...).Thanks! |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Phuong Ma | 2001-03-29 08:25:30 | inconsistent functionality with LIKE operator |
Previous Message | Patrick Coulombe | 2001-03-29 08:13:29 | 3 options |