Re: postgre vs MySQL

From: "jose javier parra sanchez" <jojapasa(at)gmail(dot)com>
To:
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: postgre vs MySQL
Date: 2008-03-12 16:47:35
Message-ID: 99f1636c0803120947w520e95f2j448cab19b403f260@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Take a look at pgpool . http://pgpool.projects.postgresql.org/
2008/3/12, Ivan Sergio Borgonovo <mail(at)webthatworks(dot)it>:
> On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:13:14 -0700
> paul rivers <rivers(dot)paul(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > For a database of InnoDB tables, people tend to replicate the
> > database, and then backup the slave (unless the db is trivially
>
>
> That recalled me the *unsupported* feeling I have that it is easier
> to setup a HA replication solution on MySQL.
>
> Pardon my ignorance of serious DBA jargon...
>
> I'm thinking to something suited for load balancing the read as
> highest priority in terms of performance *and* duplicate the write
> across different boxes without the application layer has to know
> about it as second priority in terms of performance...
>
> I just would like to be contradicted and pointed to some viable
> (easy?) setup for pgsql, so that I and other people will get rid of
> this preconception if any.
>
>
> --
> Ivan Sergio Borgonovo
> http://www.webthatworks.it
>
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tim Child 2008-03-12 16:53:23 Re: ERROR: text search configuration "pg_catalog.english" does not exist
Previous Message paul rivers 2008-03-12 16:41:54 Re: pain of postgres upgrade with extensions