Re: Why JDBC 1?

On Fri, 2001-09-07 at 00:11, Rene Pijlman wrote:
> On 04 Sep 2001 13:22:33 -0400, Dave Cramer wrote:
> >> Isn't the JDBC 2 driver also an implementation of JDBC 1?
> >Yes, it is, but many of the libraries, and methods which are used in
> >version 2 of the driver aren't available in jdk1 so it won't compile or
> >run.
>
> Ah, I see. And I assume we support JDBC 1 for applets that need
> to run in popular browsers with a JVM 1.
>
> Has it been discussed before when and how we can stop
> maintaining two versions?
>
> Are people really still using JDBC 1?

I try and run everything on the server where possible so JDBC 2 here

Tony Grant

--
RedHat Linux on Sony Vaio C1XD/S
http://www.animaproductions.com/linux2.html
Macromedia UltraDev with PostgreSQL
http://www.animaproductions.com/ultra.html