| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Vik Fearing <vik(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: primary_conninfo missing from pg_stat_wal_receiver |
| Date: | 2016-06-29 21:47:30 |
| Message-ID: | 9994.1467236850@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> There was also that (old) thread about making the recovery.conf parameters
> be general GUCs. I don't actually remember the consensus there, but diong
> that would certainly change how it's handled as well.
It strikes me that keeping a password embedded in the conninfo from being
exposed might be quite a bit harder/riskier if it became a GUC. Something
to keep in mind if we ever try to make that change ...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2016-06-29 21:55:20 | Re: primary_conninfo missing from pg_stat_wal_receiver |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2016-06-29 21:40:15 | Re: primary_conninfo missing from pg_stat_wal_receiver |