From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | "Patches (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] multiline CSV fields |
Date: | 2004-12-03 00:10:51 |
Message-ID: | 9988.1102032651@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> + if (!embedded_line_warning && (c == '\n' || c == '\r') )
> + {
> + embedded_line_warning = true;
> + elog(WARNING,
> + "CSV fields with embedded linefeed or carriage return "
> + "characters might not be able to be reimported");
> + }
What about forcibly translating them to the two-character sequences \n
or \r? Or is that not considered a CSV-compatible representation?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2004-12-03 00:11:56 | Re: 8.0RC1 tomorrow |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-12-03 00:07:17 | Re: nodeAgg perf tweak |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2004-12-03 00:27:03 | Re: [HACKERS] multiline CSV fields |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2004-12-02 23:58:29 | Re: [HACKERS] multiline CSV fields |