From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Barry Lind <blind(at)xythos(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: More thoughts about FE/BE protocol |
Date: | 2003-04-15 20:42:42 |
Message-ID: | 9987.1050439362@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> I gotta get off my duff and get with it, but I still plan to do it.
> I am wondering if the wondering if the start of 7.5 may not be a better
> time for such a massive change, and to give interfaces time to catch up.
(a) the problems are "swapped in" now; if I don't continue with this
work I'll probably forget a lot of the issues.
(b) there are some things in 7.3 --- autocommit being a big one --- that we
can *not* put off changing, or we'll be stuck with them forevermore.
(c) the interfaces do not have to catch up in time for 7.4 release,
because we'll still support the old protocol.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-04-15 21:19:27 | Re: Does libpq have SSL functions? |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-04-15 20:36:52 | Re: More thoughts about FE/BE protocol |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-04-15 23:08:30 | First draft of new FE/BE protocol spec posted for comments |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-04-15 20:36:52 | Re: More thoughts about FE/BE protocol |