| From: | Peter T Mount <peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Couple of patches for jdbc driver |
| Date: | 2001-08-22 14:52:33 |
| Message-ID: | 998491953.3b83c73151ab3@webmail.retep.org.uk |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
* Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
|
| This issue came up recently in relation to backpatching a python fix,
| and the conclusion was that jdbc 7.1.X is "a hopeless cause" and I tend
| to agree. I had >6 unapplied jdbc patches at the time we released 7.1.
| They are all now in CVS.
> I've mentioned it before, but I really think it would nice to decouple the
> release cycles of the core engine from the interfaces. Make them separate
> projects.
>
> Just my kroner,
> Gunnar
JDBC never really followed the release cycled exactly any how. It's only since
I had to step back from development that it became more rigid.
Peter
--
Peter Mount peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk
PostgreSQL JDBC Driver: http://www.retep.org.uk/postgres/
RetepPDF PDF library for Java: http://www.retep.org.uk/pdf/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-08-22 15:27:50 | Re: Couple of patches for jdbc driver |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-08-22 13:20:04 | Re: [PATCHES] patch for jdbc BigDecimal bug |