| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in> |
| Cc: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Another POC initdb patch |
| Date: | 2003-07-06 15:25:28 |
| Message-ID: | 9957.1057505128@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches pgsql-performance |
Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in> writes:
> In addition to Tom's patch, this patch asks tuning parameters right away,
> while doing initdb.
Sorry, there is zero chance of putting any interactivity into initdb.
Most RPM installations run it from the RPM install script and would be
unable to cope with this.
I disagree with the concept of expecting someone to supply useful values
at install time anyway, since a newbie is the *least* likely to have any
idea what to say at that time. Heck, the experts can hardly agree on
what to use ...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruno Wolff III | 2003-07-06 19:45:07 | Re: Proof-of-concept for initdb-time shared_buffers selection |
| Previous Message | Shridhar Daithankar | 2003-07-06 14:10:32 | Another POC initdb patch |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Martin Foster | 2003-07-06 20:16:37 | Re: Extreme high load averages |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-07-06 15:19:25 | Re: [PERFORM] Extreme high load averages |