| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Frederick Ross" <madhadron(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: concatenating setof functions |
| Date: | 2007-04-16 19:38:54 |
| Message-ID: | 9956.1176752334@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
"Frederick Ross" <madhadron(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> But say I have a table with an integer column. If I had a pure SQL
> function, I could call
> select twohundreds(i) from table;
> and get a properly concatenated list of the rows resulting from
> applying twohundreds to each row of table. This is deprecated
> according to the documentation, and it doesn't work at all with
> PLPGSQL, so how should I go about doing it?
I believe you can make an end-run around the implementation restriction
by creating a SQL-language function that's a wrapper around your plpgsql
function.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | garry saddington | 2007-04-16 20:33:45 | delete with self join |
| Previous Message | Frederick Ross | 2007-04-16 19:30:49 | concatenating setof functions |