BDR 1.0: background worker wants to start that should not be there

From: "Daniel Fink (PDF)" <daniel(dot)fink(at)pdf(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: BDR 1.0: background worker wants to start that should not be there
Date: 2019-02-12 14:52:09
Message-ID: 9948a2f6ff8846248974dbe597ea7cae@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Hi all,

After I used bdr.bdr_part_by_node_names(*p_nodes text[]*) and removed the
nodes from bdr.bdr_nodes table I still get log errors about the nonexistent
pg_replication_slot:

< 2019-02-12 06:26:21.166 PST >LOG: starting background worker process
"bdr (6208877715678412212,1,22576474,)->bdr (6449651545875285115"

How does postgresql deduce which workers need starting?

Is there a table I am missing?

Best Regards,

*DANIEL FINK*

*Senior Software Engineer*

*tel* (+49) 89.767062.20
*fax*(+49) 89.767062.11
email daniel(dot)fink(at)pdf(dot)com

*PDF Solutions GmbH*
* (**a PDF Solutions Company)*
Managing Director: Kimon Michaels
Schwanthalerstr. 10
D-80336 München, Germany

München HRB 87307
DE 128214899

*www.pdf.com <http://www.pdf.com/>*

--
This message may contain confidential and privileged information. If it has
been sent to you in error, please reply to advise the sender of the error
and then immediately permanently delete it and all attachments to it from
your systems. If you are not the intended recipient, do not read, copy,
disclose or otherwise use this message or any attachments to it. The sender
disclaims any liability for such unauthorized use. PLEASE NOTE that all
incoming e-mails sent to PDF e-mail accounts will be archived and may be
scanned by us and/or by external service providers to detect and prevent
threats to our systems, investigate illegal or inappropriate behavior,
and/or eliminate unsolicited promotional e-mails (“spam”). If you have any
concerns about this process, please contact us at legal(dot)department(at)pdf(dot)com
<mailto:legal(dot)department(at)pdf(dot)com>.

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Pryzby 2019-02-12 15:12:17 Re: postgresql v11.1 Segmentation fault: signal 11: by running SELECT... JIT Issue?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2019-02-12 14:14:06 Re: SV: Implementing pgaudit extension on Microsoft Windows