Re: Patent issues and 8.1

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Patent issues and 8.1
Date: 2005-01-26 05:02:07
Message-ID: 9948.1106715727@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> writes:
> I've posted a patch to -patches that replaces ARC with LRU. The patch is
> stable -- I'll post some code cleanup for it tomorrow, but I've yet to
> find any bugs despite a fair bit of testing. The patch also reverts the
> code to being quite close to 7.4, which is another reason to have some
> confidence in its correctness.

I've already pointed out a couple reasons why I don't have any
confidence in its correctness. This may be the right path to go for
8.0.* ... but we must NOT suppose that we can just push it out without
a full beta test cycle.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Benjamin Arai 2005-01-26 05:02:30 Status of PostgreSQL for 4+ processors
Previous Message Neil Conway 2005-01-26 04:38:53 Re: Patent issues and 8.1