From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Mario Weilguni <mweilguni(at)sime(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Getting different number of results when using hashjoin on/off |
Date: | 2005-11-28 15:11:31 |
Message-ID: | 9936.1133190691@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Mario Weilguni <mweilguni(at)sime(dot)com> writes:
> The failing case is:
> ...
> SubPlan
> -> Hash Join (cost=8.47..19.46 rows=1 width=0) (actual time=0.004..0.004 rows=0 loops=21619)
> Hash Cond: ("outer".id = "inner".str_id)
> -> Bitmap Heap Scan on structure str (cost=2.02..12.92 rows=6 width=4) (actual time=0.100..30.095 rows=1 loops=1)
> Recheck Cond: (path ~ '142.2330445.2330598.2330676.*'::lquery)
> -> Bitmap Index Scan on str_uk4 (cost=0.00..2.02 rows=6 width=0) (actual time=0.090..0.090 rows=1 loops=1)
> Index Cond: (path ~ '142.2330445.2330598.2330676.*'::lquery)
> -> Hash (cost=6.43..6.43 rows=5 width=4) (actual time=0.032..0.032 rows=0 loops=1)
> -> Bitmap Heap Scan on foo2 bz (cost=2.02..6.43 rows=5 width=4) (actual time=0.025..0.025 rows=0 loops=1)
> Recheck Cond: (bid = $0)
> -> Bitmap Index Scan on foo2_bid_key1 (cost=0.00..2.02 rows=5 width=0) (actual time=0.021..0.021 rows=0 loops=1)
> Index Cond: (bid = $0)
Hmm, I wonder why the hash join's input nodes are showing "loops=1" ...
the hash depends on the subplan parameter $0 so it needs to be
re-evaluated each time through. It looks like that's not happening.
Do you have the corresponding results from 8.0 --- if so, what do
the loop counts look like?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | James Robinson | 2005-11-28 16:04:39 | Help: 8.0.3 Vacuum of an empty table never completes ... |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-11-28 15:04:20 | Re: Ipv6 and Postgresql 8.0.3 |