From: | Christopher Smith <x(at)xman(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [SQL] Problems ensuring uniqueness? |
Date: | 2001-06-18 21:57:45 |
Message-ID: | 992901470.6585.2.camel@rivest.xdrive.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc pgsql-sql |
On 18 Jun 2001 17:42:15 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Christopher Smith <x(at)xman(dot)org> writes:
> Um ... surely that should be "if count > 0" ? Or was that just a
> transcription error?
>
> This approach certainly ought to work as desired given the exclusive
> lock, so a silly typo seems like a plausible explanation...
Sorry, it is indeed a transcription error (sadly). The actual line in
question looks like this in Java:
boolean answer = resultSetCount.getInt(1) > 0;
I accidently transcribed the field offset instead of the comparison
constant.... probably should split that up into two lines of code to
avoid confusion like this...
--Chris
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-06-18 22:04:14 | Re: [SQL] Problems ensuring uniqueness? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-06-18 21:42:15 | Re: [SQL] Problems ensuring uniqueness? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-06-18 22:04:14 | Re: [SQL] Problems ensuring uniqueness? |
Previous Message | Tony Reina | 2001-06-18 21:54:24 | Are there array functions in Postgres? |