From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | Brent Verner <brent(at)rcfile(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL |
Date: | 2002-01-21 17:23:37 |
Message-ID: | 9915.1011633817@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> As a PostgreSQL developer, I don't agree with the statement you made for
> another reason: It implies that there is something better about the GPL
> and we have to justify ourselves for not using it. We don't.
Quite true. I like the last few variants Bruce has proposed, along the
lines of "We like the BSD license and see no reason to change."
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-01-21 17:24:32 | Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-01-21 17:21:07 | Re: How does one return rows from plpgsql functions? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-01-21 17:24:32 | Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL |
Previous Message | Vince Vielhaber | 2002-01-21 17:16:40 | Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL |