Re: [GENERAL] Future of PostgreSQL

From: Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, "Clark C(dot) Evans" <clark(dot)evans(at)manhattanproject(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-general <pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Future of PostgreSQL
Date: 1999-12-27 03:18:54
Message-ID: 99122622434800.00550@lorc.wgcr.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Sun, 26 Dec 1999, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Dec 1999, Clark C. Evans wrote:
> > Plug-in Oracle 7 compatibility.
>
> I know we have (and have for awhile) a good deal of Oracle
> compatibility...what do you mean by 'Plug-In Oracle 7 compatibility'?

Plug in Oracle compatibility would mean being able to drop a PostgreSQL server
as a replacement to an Oracle server and not having to reconfigure any clients,
rewrite any SQL, and basically not even know that the database server has been
changed.

I personally don't think that 100% drop-in Oracle Compatibility is a good goal
-- see Philip Greenspun's Oracle Tips page at
http://photo.net/wtr/oracle-tips.html. He also has some real good points
about LONG types and oracle CLOBs -- tips that are very worth reading, IMO.

I want my long texts to be transparent to my tcl code -- I want to index them
for speed, and I want full functionality -- I don't want CLOBS (a takeoff on
Postgres/Illustra large objects, IIANM).

....

--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Howie 1999-12-27 05:26:40 pgsql 7.x...
Previous Message Mike Mascari 1999-12-27 03:12:32 Re: [GENERAL] pgsql 7.x...