| From: | Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Mike Mascari" <mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Lincoln Yeoh" <lylyeoh(at)mecomb(dot)com>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "PostgreSQL Developers List" <hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions |
| Date: | 1999-11-26 21:51:55 |
| Message-ID: | 99112616564608.00541@lorc.wgcr.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 26 Nov 1999, Mike Mascari wrote:
> The DCOM remark was just a joke ;-). My remark concerning ORACLE was in
> response to Andreas' comment that implicit COMMITs of DDL statements was
> absurd. I wanted to simply point out that, since ORACLE has 70% market
> share,
I did not see the response to Andreas, nor did I see Andreas' assertion that it
was absurd. My apologies.
> counterparts and to be able to "undo" filesystem operations. That, it seems
> to
> me, will be a major undertaking and not going to happen any time soon...
Yes, that is true. As long as the storage manager relies on the filesystem for
table names, this will be a problem, unless filesystem deletions are delayed
until COMMIT, and filesystem creates are undone at a ROLLBACK.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Matthew Leo | 1999-11-26 23:12:58 | Re: PostgreSQL |
| Previous Message | Mike Mascari | 1999-11-26 20:32:04 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 1999-11-26 22:48:05 | RE: [HACKERS] Concurrent VACUUM: first results |
| Previous Message | Mike Mascari | 1999-11-26 20:32:04 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions |