From: | Ian Phillips <ian(at)comodo(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)hub(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PL/pgsql or C/C++ |
Date: | 1999-11-24 16:21:57 |
Message-ID: | 99112416284908.07130@Gromit |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, 24 Nov 1999, you wrote:
>
> Date: Tue, 23 Nov 1999 12:19:53 -0600 (CST)
> From: ^chewie <chewie(at)wookimus(dot)net>
> Subject: PL/pgsql or C/C++
>
> This is a general question expecting general answers. I've read the
> documentation concerning triggers and functions, as well as the
> documentation on the different languages you can use for driving these
> triggers and functions. Aside from portability and the lack of having
> to explicitly compiling a C/C++ library, what advantages does PL/pgsql
> have over C/C++ or even PL/tcl?
>
> ^chewie
>
Ease of use is probably the biggest plus. For running a 'quick and dirty'
trigger, it's a lot easier than compiling a C library or (in my case) learning
TCL. I suppose if you already know TCL, there isn't that much point.
--
Ian Phillips
ian(at)comodo(dot)net
"The Z80 - The Chip of the Seventies! Today!"
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-11-24 16:48:21 | Re: [GENERAL] Re: Is PostgreSQL ready for mission critical applications? |
Previous Message | hostmaster | 1999-11-24 16:21:09 | (no subject) |