| From: | Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "nicks(dot)emails" <nicks(dot)emails(at)ic24(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Backend terminated abnormally |
| Date: | 1999-11-02 03:46:20 |
| Message-ID: | 99110122474300.07347@lorc.wgcr.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 01 Nov 1999, Tom Lane wrote:
> Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org> writes:
> >> The problem is with the following query,
> >> select l.s # p.ss from LSEG_TBL l, LSEG_TBL1 p;
>
> > Duplicated with PostgreSQL 6.5.2 on RedHat 6.0, egcs 1.1.2.
>
> Hmm, does everyone but me have a table named LSEG_TBL1 in the
> regress tests? I've grepped both current and REL6_5 and I'll
> be durned if I can find any use of that name. I'd look into it
> if I had a reproducible test case...
>
> regards, tom lane
Oh, sorry, Tom. SELECT * INTO TABLE LSEG_TBL1 FROM LSEG_TBL; first.
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Lamar Owen | 1999-11-02 03:49:38 | Re: [HACKERS] pgaccess 0.98 |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 1999-11-02 03:37:57 | Re: [HACKERS] sort on huge table |