From: | "Jonas Lindholm" <jonas(dot)lindholm(at)omgroup(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Re: Maximum size of one table |
Date: | 2001-03-14 20:07:35 |
Message-ID: | 98oj6g$1f8$1@news.tht.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Thanks, good news.
I'm also pleased to know that the file size limit has been removed with LFS
on Linux 2.4 and I'll give it a try.
/Jonas L.
"Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote in message
news:25370(dot)984585704(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us(dot)(dot)(dot)
> jdassen(at)cistron(dot)nl (J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)) writes:
> > Your options to have >2Gb files on GNU/Linux therefore include
> > - switching to a 64bit platform, say Alpha, Itanic or PowerPC64 or
> > - switching to a recent (>= 2.1) version of the GNU C library and a
recent
> > (e.g. 2.4.x) kernel.
>
> However, this is all irrelevant to Jonas' question, which is whether
> he needs to worry about it for Postgres. He doesn't. PG splits large
> tables into gigabyte-sized chunks to avoid OS file size limitations.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jan Ploski | 2001-03-14 20:09:33 | Compiling 7.1 JDBC driver |
Previous Message | Richard H | 2001-03-14 20:02:35 | Re: Case Insensitive CHECK CONSTRAINTs |