Re: Some leftovers of recent message cleanup?

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
To: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Some leftovers of recent message cleanup?
Date: 2021-08-25 01:05:25
Message-ID: 98e700f4-5614-9e5a-f831-5dd7ab8478d9@oss.nttdata.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2021/08/23 15:27, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> So this patch is meaningful only for v13 and later, too. Not sure what
> to do for v12 and earlier but doesn't seem to be in much necessity.

Probably I failed to get your point... I was thinking that
your 0001 patch can be back-patched to v11. And also
the attached patch can be applied to v10 and v9.6. If we do this,
the log messages can be consistent between versions.
But you think that we should not change the log messages
in v12 or before, for some reasons?

I pushed your 0002 patch. Thanks!

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION

Attachment Content-Type Size
pg10.patch text/plain 614 bytes

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2021-08-25 01:12:41 Re: pgstat_send_connstats() introduces unnecessary timestamp and UDP overhead
Previous Message Euler Taveira 2021-08-25 00:21:57 Re: row filtering for logical replication