Re: pg_upgrade fails if vacuum_defer_cleanup_age > 0

From: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade fails if vacuum_defer_cleanup_age > 0
Date: 2020-06-16 06:39:57
Message-ID: 98e32324abcce74c70738fc6c0ed47abe3e686b5.camel@cybertec.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 2020-06-15 at 20:59 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 08:46:36AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 04:07:05PM +0200, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> > > A customer's upgrade failed, and it took me a while to
> > > figure out that the problem was that they had set
> > > "vacuum_defer_cleanup_age=10000" on the new cluster.
> > >
> > > The consequence was that the "vacuumdb --freeze" that
> > > takes place before copying commit log files failed to
> > > freeze "pg_database".
> > > That caused later updates to the table to fail with
> > > "Could not open file "pg_xact/0000": No such file or directory."
> > >
> > > I think it would increase the robustness of pg_upgrade to
> > > force "vacuum_defer_cleanup_age" to 0 on the new cluster.
>
> Thank you, applied to all supported PG versions.

Thanks for picking this up and taking care of it.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message 李杰 (慎追) 2020-06-16 06:49:08 回复:回复:回复:how to create index concurrently on partitioned table
Previous Message Amit Langote 2020-06-16 06:14:55 Re: Getting ERROR with FOR UPDATE/SHARE for partitioned table.