From: | gkokolatos(at)pm(dot)me |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Teach pg_receivewal to use lz4 compression |
Date: | 2021-11-03 08:05:53 |
Message-ID: | 98dDHVqTFjZbSkNWXboFJwkOhbR0l6v72vtj31Zels9d5P9wmLxTKqdaipQjkRFEhafwNU3Ds_V0NC8hrpu_JqEJ3JHVIzTIRKNv_IjmVJ4=@pm.me |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Wednesday, November 3rd, 2021 at 12:23 AM, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 12:31:47PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 8:17 AM Magnus Hagander magnus(at)hagander(dot)net wrote:
>>> I think for the end user, it is strictly better to name it "gzip",
>>> and given that the target of this option is the end user we should
>>> do so. (It'd be different it we were talking about a build-time
>>> parameter to configure).
>>
>> I agree. Also, I think there's actually a file format called "zlib"
>> which is slightly different from the "gzip" format, and you have to be
>> careful not to generate the wrong one.
>
> Okay, fine by me. It would be better to be also consistent in
> WalCompressionMethods once we switch to this option value, then.
I will revert to gzip for version 9. Should be out shortly.
Cheers,
//Georgios
>
> Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrey Borodin | 2021-11-03 08:44:49 | Re: lastOverflowedXid does not handle transaction ID wraparound |
Previous Message | Victor Spirin | 2021-11-03 07:51:01 | Re: Atomic rename feature for Windows. |