| From: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: CREATE/ALTER ROLE PASSWORD ('value' USING 'method') |
| Date: | 2017-03-09 15:00:47 |
| Message-ID: | 98cafcd0-5557-0bdf-4837-0f2b7782d0b5@joeconway.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 03/09/2017 06:34 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 7:59 AM, Michael Paquier
> <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Yes, I agree with that for MD5, and after looking around I can see
>> (like here http://prosody.im/doc/plain_or_hashed) as well that
>> SCRAM-hashed is used. Now, there are as well references to the salt,
>> like in protocol.sgml:
>> "The salt to use when encrypting the password."
>> Joe, do you think that in this case using the term "hashing" would be
>> more appropriate? I would think so as we use it to hash the password.
>
> I'm not Joe, but I think that would be more appropriate.
I am Joe and I agree ;-)
--
Crunchy Data - http://crunchydata.com
PostgreSQL Support for Secure Enterprises
Consulting, Training, & Open Source Development
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2017-03-09 15:05:00 | Re: partitioned tables and contrib/sepgsql |
| Previous Message | Mike Palmiotto | 2017-03-09 14:59:14 | Re: partitioned tables and contrib/sepgsql |