From: | missive(at)frontiernet(dot)net (Lee Harr) |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: inheritance and primary/foreign keys |
Date: | 2001-03-10 02:05:36 |
Message-ID: | 98c25g$1mn0$1@node17.cwnet.frontiernet.net |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, 9 Mar 2001 19:34:31 +0000 (UTC), Stephan Szabo
<sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com> wrote:
>
>On Fri, 9 Mar 2001, Einar Karttunen wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, Stephan Szabo wrote:
>> >
>> > You cannot safely reference tops of inheritance trees under 7.0 or 7.1 and
>> > have it reference the trees.
>> >
>> Is there anyway to emulate this? I want to have several types of persons
>
>Someone's been trying to get a workaround. Hopefully if they get it done,
>they'll post it to the list. However it's still fairly ugly.
>
I was working on something very similar to this.
What I did was have all of the records get serial numbers from the same
sequence, and use a function ( "is_person" ) to tell whether or not the
id was valid.
I went back and forth about making these tables use inheritance. Really the
only thing I wanted was to have unique "person_id"s for everyone and I
don't think it is necessary to use the actual inheritance mechanism to
implement this.
What other advantages are there to using inheritance?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ben | 2001-03-10 02:12:06 | Re: what's going on here? |
Previous Message | Ben | 2001-03-10 02:02:38 | Re: what's going on here? |