From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Aidan Van Dyk" <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca>, "Brendan Jurd" <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Bryce Nesbitt" <bryce2(at)obviously(dot)com>, heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com |
Subject: | Re: Proposed patch - psql wraps at window width |
Date: | 2008-04-24 22:38:11 |
Message-ID: | 9886.1209076691@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
>> On what platforms does ioctl() fail?
> On ssh for example.
That'd certainly be a showstopper if true, but it seems to be okay for
me. ssh'ing from an xterm window, and running psql on the remote side,
I can see with gdb that ioctl(TIOCGWINSZ) succeeds and gives a result
that correctly tracks window resizes --- indeed there are several bits
of psql that I'd never have committed if they didn't work in this
environment, because it's been my everyday work environment for years.
Maybe you are used to an ancient ssh version?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Treat | 2008-04-25 01:59:57 | Re: MERGE Specification |
Previous Message | Gregory Stark | 2008-04-24 22:35:33 | Re: Proposed patch - psql wraps at window width |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gregory Stark | 2008-04-25 05:04:38 | Re: Proposed patch - psql wraps at window width |
Previous Message | Gregory Stark | 2008-04-24 22:16:17 | Re: Proposed patch - psql wraps at window width |