From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Donald Dong <xdong(at)csumb(dot)edu> |
Cc: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Actual Cost |
Date: | 2019-02-17 05:31:33 |
Message-ID: | 9871.1550381493@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Donald Dong <xdong(at)csumb(dot)edu> writes:
> On Feb 16, 2019, at 6:44 PM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>> I don't quite understand what is meant by "actual cost metric" and/or
>> how is that different from running EXPLAIN ANALYZE.
> Here is an example:
> Hash Join (cost=3.92..18545.70 rows=34 width=32) (actual cost=3.92..18500 time=209.820..1168.831 rows=47 loops=3)
> Now we have the actual time. Time can have a high variance (a change
> in system load, or just noises), but I think the actual cost would be
> less likely to change due to external factors.
I'm with Tomas: you have not explained what you think those
numbers mean.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Donald Dong | 2019-02-17 06:45:13 | Re: Actual Cost |
Previous Message | Noah Misch | 2019-02-17 04:09:13 | Re: Spurious "apparent wraparound" via SimpleLruTruncate() rounding |