| From: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Incremental backup from a streaming replication standby fails |
| Date: | 2024-07-19 18:41:50 |
| Message-ID: | 985825083da240ef8f3e32e2f49fc93fe1aeac7e.camel@cybertec.at |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 2024-07-19 at 12:59 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
Thanks for looking at this.
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2024 at 11:32 AM David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> wrote:
> > I think it would be enough just to add a hint such as:
> >
> > HINT: this is possible when making a standby backup with little or no
> > activity.
>
> That could work (with "this" capitalized).
>
> > My guess is in production environments this will be uncommon.
>
> I think so too, but when it does happen, confusion may be common.
I guess this will most likely happen during tests like the one I made.
I'd be alright with the hint, but I'd say "during making an *incremental*
standby backup", because that's the only case where it can happen.
I think it would also be sufficient if we document that possibility.
When I got the error, I looked at the documentation of incremental
backup for any limitations with standby servers, but didn't find any.
A remark in the documentation would have satisfied me.
Yours,
Laurenz
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2024-07-19 18:45:01 | Re: Wrong results with grouping sets |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2024-07-19 18:32:47 | Re: pg_ctl start may return 0 even if the postmaster has been already started on Windows |