Re: RFC: Additional Directory for Extensions

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
Cc: Matheus Alcantara <matheusssilv97(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Gabriele Bartolini <gabriele(dot)bartolini(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(dot)ringer(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: RFC: Additional Directory for Extensions
Date: 2025-03-20 14:35:51
Message-ID: 984633.1742481351@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> writes:
> On 19.03.25 20:25, Matheus Alcantara wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 3:56 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> Buildfarm member snakefly doesn't like this too much.

> I was able to reproduce the problem from scratch using:

> ./configure ...
> make # no contrib
> make -C src/test/modules/test_extensions check

> So it depended on in which order you build the various components.

That makes sense, but I wonder how snakefly hit it while other BF
animals did not. It's running a reasonably up-to-date BF client
version and there's nothing odd-looking about its configuration.

Anyway, I see snakefly is green now so that tweak did fix it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2025-03-20 14:53:17 Re: RFC: Additional Directory for Extensions
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2025-03-20 14:18:07 Re: SQL:2023 JSON simplified accessor support