From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
Cc: | Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>, pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Refresh timer in status window very unintuitive |
Date: | 2010-02-18 11:27:29 |
Message-ID: | 9837222c1002180327i40903da3s73ef60221b03b88e@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
2010/2/17 Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>:
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 10:17 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
> <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
>> The server status patch for previous release had quite some changes, so
>> I'm not sure that four timers are still essential. Anyways, we can still
>> have four different timers and only one refresh rate.
>>
>> Dave, do you remember why you think four timers are essential?
>
> Because refreshing some panes is much more expensive than others. If
> you can come up with a better UI design, feel free, but I don't want
> to lose the ability to have different refresh rates for each pane.
Do we actually need different ones for each pane though, or do we just
need one for the log and one for the rest? (That might open up more
options for how to make such an UI..)
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2010-02-18 11:55:02 | Re: Refresh timer in status window very unintuitive |
Previous Message | Guillaume Lelarge | 2010-02-17 17:27:31 | Re: Refresh timer in status window very unintuitive |