Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0, Postgres vs. PostgreSQL

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, Mark Mielke <mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc>, Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca>, Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>
Subject: Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0, Postgres vs. PostgreSQL
Date: 2010-01-23 21:22:24
Message-ID: 9837222c1001231322p5a121a91q189fb097dee8e4f4@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers pgsql-hackers

2010/1/23 Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>:
> <digs a little> A yes, and here are those statistics I posted a couple of
> years ago, showing site traffic into our website.
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-advocacy/2007-09/msg00108.php
> These are for the people who figure it out, I wonder how many people we miss
> out on because they get sidetracked trying to find out more about postgre?

FYI, the figures for the past month are:
1. postgresql 45,579 10.91%
2. postgres 16,225 3.88%
3. postgre 4,901 1.17%
4. postgresql download 4,590 1.10%
5. postgresql tutorial 2,408 0.58%
6. pg_dump 1,755 0.42%
7. psql 1,360 0.33%
8. postgresql odbc 1,022 0.24%
9. postgre sql 964 0.23%
10. pg_restore 871 0.21%

--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David E. Wheeler 2010-01-23 21:27:03 Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0, Postgres vs. PostgreSQL
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2010-01-23 21:19:11 Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0, Postgres vs. PostgreSQL

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dimitri Fontaine 2010-01-23 21:24:41 Re: commit fests
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2010-01-23 21:19:11 Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0, Postgres vs. PostgreSQL