From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | "A(dot) Kretschmer" <andreas(dot)kretschmer(at)schollglas(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: 64bits or 32 bits on ESX? |
Date: | 2010-01-21 12:01:29 |
Message-ID: | 9837222c1001210401w289f8448q2774e9f20d6fbcbc@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 12:45, A. Kretschmer
<andreas(dot)kretschmer(at)schollglas(dot)com> wrote:
> In response to Magnus Hagander :
>> 2010/1/21 Bjørn T Johansen <btj(at)havleik(dot)no>:
>> > We are going to be setting up a PostgreSQL server on a guest under VMWare ESX 4... Is there any performance improvement by choosing 64bits Linux over
>> > 32bits Linux as the guest OS or is it almost the same?
>>
>> How much resources do you plan to give the machine?
>>
>> If you're setting up a very constrained machine with little memory, go
>> with the 32-bit version. It'll use slightly less memory which can be
>> important if you're constrained.
>>
>> If you're setting up a medium size or bigger machine (2Gb+ memory),
>> use a 64-bit version. If you plan you may eventually need to increase
>
> Really? With ONLY 2Gb? Why? What is the performance improvement, with
> 64Bit all pointers and so on needs more memory so i'm expecting lesser
> memory for the data.
>
> I'm wrong?
While the theoretical limit is a bit higher, the fact that you have to
reinstall once you've realized you wanted to add a little bit more
memory.... More important to me at least :-)
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bjørn T Johansen | 2010-01-21 12:11:42 | Re: 64bits or 32 bits on ESX? |
Previous Message | A. Kretschmer | 2010-01-21 11:45:47 | Re: 64bits or 32 bits on ESX? |