Re: Git out of sync vs. CVS

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, tgl <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, peter_e <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Git out of sync vs. CVS
Date: 2010-01-19 16:02:31
Message-ID: 9837222c1001190802y87ea298i2d965939c798f559@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tuesday, January 19, 2010, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 01:53, Kevin Grittner
>> <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> wrote:
>>> Magnus Hagander  wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>> the Git repository is missing parts of two non-recent commits.
>>>
>>>> We've seen this happen before.
>>>
>>> That seems like kind of a blasé attitude toward something upon which
>>> some people rely.
>>
>> For the record, I am one of those people. I use it for *all* my
>> postgresql development. And this is a serious pain.
>
> FWIW, I am in favor of rewinding and making everyone rebase, but I
> think we should do it ASAP.

Got time to figure out exactly how far to rewind?

/Magnus

--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Aidan Van Dyk 2010-01-19 16:03:08 Re: Git out of sync vs. CVS
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2010-01-19 16:01:27 Re: Patch: Remove gcc dependency in definition of inline functions