From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Pierre Frédéric Caillaud <lists(at)peufeu(dot)com> |
Cc: | "fkater(at)googlemail(dot)com" <fkater(at)googlemail(dot)com>, pgsql-performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used? |
Date: | 2010-01-15 05:38:48 |
Message-ID: | 9837222c1001142138m3a1d9aa0q215fd52751af2d39@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
2010/1/15 Pierre Frédéric Caillaud <lists(at)peufeu(dot)com>:
> On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 22:28:07 +0100, fkater(at)googlemail(dot)com <fkater(at)googlemail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> Pierre Frédéric Caillaud:
>>
>>> > 4 Core CPU 3 Ghz, WinXP, 1 TB SATA disk.
>>>
>>> Big CPU and slow disk...
>>>
>>> You should add another disk just for the WAL -- disks are pretty cheap
>>> these days.
>>> Writing the WAL on a second disk is the first thing to do on a
>>> configuration like yours, if you are limited by writes.
>>> It also reduces the fsync lag a lot since the disk is only doing WAL.
>>
>> Good idea -- where can I set the path to WAL?
>
> At install, or use a symlink (they exist on windows too !...)
>
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1901405/postgresql-wal-on-windows
>
> I've no idea of the other needed NTFS tweaks, like if there is a noatime/nodiratime ?...
It does. See http://www.hagander.net/talks/Advanced%20PostgreSQL%20on%20Windows.pdf
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Smith | 2010-01-15 05:46:26 | Re: new server I/O setup |
Previous Message | Greg Smith | 2010-01-15 05:17:15 | Re: New server to improve performance on our large and busy DB - advice? |