| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_dump sort order for functions |
| Date: | 2010-01-12 15:12:18 |
| Message-ID: | 9837222c1001120712t1e64eb2fg9f502757b600233e@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 15:59, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
>> Sorry if this is talking about something completely different, haven't
>> followed the thread closely, but: will this change the output of
>> pg_restore -l? If so, changing the tag is likely to break scripts, and
>> IMHO should be avoided if possible.
>
> Only to the extent of possibly changing the order of entries. Neither
> of us is proposing changing the content of the tag.
Ok, then I think it'd be fine. Ignore me :-)
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-01-12 15:49:47 | Re: bug in integration SQL parser to plpgsq |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-01-12 14:59:18 | Re: pg_dump sort order for functions |