From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_dump sort order for functions |
Date: | 2010-01-12 14:53:38 |
Message-ID: | 9837222c1001120653w61c1fa96hd3a5040e719c36a6@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 15:44, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
>> On mån, 2010-01-11 at 12:54 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> -- Name: binary_coercible(oid, oid); Type: FUNCTION; Schema: public; Owner: postgres
>
>> Um, that tag is the "name", and if you change that, the name in CREATE
>> FUNCTION also changes.
>
> So?
Sorry if this is talking about something completely different, haven't
followed the thread closely, but: will this change the output of
pg_restore -l? If so, changing the tag is likely to break scripts, and
IMHO should be avoided if possible.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Merlin Moncure | 2010-01-12 14:54:24 | Re: Typed tables |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-01-12 14:44:55 | Re: pg_dump sort order for functions |