Re: pg_dump sort order for functions

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_dump sort order for functions
Date: 2010-01-12 14:53:38
Message-ID: 9837222c1001120653w61c1fa96hd3a5040e719c36a6@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 15:44, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
>> On mån, 2010-01-11 at 12:54 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> -- Name: binary_coercible(oid, oid); Type: FUNCTION; Schema: public; Owner: postgres
>
>> Um, that tag is the "name", and if you change that, the name in CREATE
>> FUNCTION also changes.
>
> So?

Sorry if this is talking about something completely different, haven't
followed the thread closely, but: will this change the output of
pg_restore -l? If so, changing the tag is likely to break scripts, and
IMHO should be avoided if possible.

--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlin Moncure 2010-01-12 14:54:24 Re: Typed tables
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-01-12 14:44:55 Re: pg_dump sort order for functions