Re: enable-thread-safety defaults?

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: enable-thread-safety defaults?
Date: 2009-11-25 10:02:52
Message-ID: 9837222c0911250202j138b21f3xfb53931e522e41a8@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2009/11/24 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
>> ISTM that it should be as simple as the attached patch. Seems to work
>> for me :-) But I'm no autoconf guru, so maybe I missed something?
>
> This patch sort of begs the question "what about enable-thread-safety-force?"
> That looks even more like a wart now than it did before.

Agreed. But how about we try it piece-by-piece, which is we start with
this to see if it actually hits any of our bf platforms?

--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hannu Krosing 2009-11-25 10:03:17 Re: Partitioning option for COPY
Previous Message KaiGai Kohei 2009-11-25 09:55:32 Re: SE-PgSQL patch review