From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Jesse Morris <jmorris(at)coverity(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: BUG #5065: pg_ctl start fails as administrator, with "could not locate matching postgres executable" |
Date: | 2009-11-16 08:30:28 |
Message-ID: | 9837222c0911160030x18e8c6b6i4156f01ad05d3aa8@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 06:23, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
>>> On Saturday, November 14, 2009, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>>> Not 8.2?
>
>> Done.
>
> Buildfarm member narwhal seems to think it's not quite right in 8.2.
Drat.
So, the new API function requires Windows 2000 or more, and I think
the reason it's failing is that the headers in 8.2 don't specify that
at this point. Which means that 8.2 today theoretically at least runs
on NT4. Which leads to the question - do we want to back out the
patch, have 8.2 keep working on that, and having 8.2 fail in the few
unusual scenarios we have now, or do we also backpatch the requirement
to run on win2k or later?
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2009-11-16 09:04:27 | Multixact and prepared transactions |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-11-16 05:23:21 | Re: BUG #5065: pg_ctl start fails as administrator, with "could not locate matching postgres executable" |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2009-11-16 08:32:59 | Re: [HACKERS] pgsql: /home/peter/commit-msg |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2009-11-16 08:17:56 | Re: [HACKERS] pgsql: /home/peter/commit-msg |