From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Tsutomu Yamada <tsutomu(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] "could not reattach to shared memory" on Windows |
Date: | 2009-08-11 14:30:26 |
Message-ID: | 9837222c0908110730wffea694wbe4567190483e12a@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 19:33, Magnus Hagander<magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 16:58, Tom Lane<tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
>>> On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 16:10, Tom Lane<tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>>> 8.2 as well, no?
>>
>>> 8.2 has a different shmem implementation - the one that emulates sysv
>>> shmem. The patch will need to be changed around for that, and I
>>> haven't looked at that. It may be worthwhile to do that, but it's a
>>> separate patch, so let's get it out in 8.3 and 8.4 first.
>>
>> If it's at all hard to do, I could see deprecating 8.2 for Windows
>> instead.
>
> I haven't looked at how much work it would be at all yet. So let's do
> that before we decide to deprecate anything. As mentioned downthread,
> 8.2 is a very widespread release, and we really want to avoid
> deprecating it.
Here's an attempt at a backport to 8.2. I haven't examined it in
detail, but it passes "make check" on mingw.
Comments?
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
virtualalloc_82.patch | text/x-diff | 5.5 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2009-08-11 14:54:22 | Re: Hot standby and synchronous replication status |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-08-11 14:02:01 | Re: Shipping documentation untarred |