From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
Cc: | Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>, pgadmin-support(at)postgresql(dot)org, Stephan Jaensch <sjaensch(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Subject: | Re: Cannot paste text from eclipse 3.5 to PGAdmin III |
Date: | 2009-08-04 12:39:13 |
Message-ID: | 9837222c0908040539p479dcac8m58a064e0c3e593e2@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-support |
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 10:14, Dave Page<dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 9:07 AM, Guillaume Lelarge<guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
>>
>> We are not yet compatible with 2.9.0. I began the work on that, but I'm afraid
>> this will be a hard work.
>
> That's what I was afraid of. I've heard they've done some pretty major
> redesign (hence the planned move from 2.x.x to 3.x.x).
>
> If we do move, I suspect we'll end up chasing new wxWidgets bugs for
> months to come as well. I was toying with the idea of keeping our own
> set of wxWidgets patchs, as there's also a nasty issue with the STC
> that Ashesh and Hiroshi have started looking into, but that doesn't
> help on platforms like Ubuntu and Fedora where users will be using the
> stock wxWidgets packages- and I whilst I could live with rolling our
> own custom wxWidgets tarball, I certainly don't want to do RPMs and
> DEBs etc.
If we have our own, couldn't we just link statically?
That said, I bet they have *other* patches in that are specific to
their distribution - they often do. And having to somehow end up
having to merge these things back and forth doesn't sound particularly
entertaining.
--
Magnus Hagander
Self: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2009-08-04 13:08:41 | Re: Cannot paste text from eclipse 3.5 to PGAdmin III |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2009-08-04 08:24:34 | Re: pgadmin goes to infinite loop |