| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | bbeyer(at)purdue(dot)edu |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Possible limit on transaction size? |
| Date: | 2008-09-13 16:12:21 |
| Message-ID: | 9833.1221322341@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
bbeyer(at)purdue(dot)edu writes:
> About 150 million records into the import process, I get the following error:
> ERROR: lock AccessShareLock on object 51533/51769/0 is already held
What PG version? Can you put together a self-contained test case?
(It's probably independent of the data, so you could make a script that
just processes a lot of dummy data the same way you are doing.)
There was a similar report a couple of weeks ago:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2008-08/msg00264.php
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2008-09/msg00021.php
but that person hasn't gotten back to us on determining exactly
what happened.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-09-13 16:15:45 | Re: "Healing" a table after massive updates |
| Previous Message | Ben Chobot | 2008-09-13 15:44:46 | detecting recurring appointment conflicts |