Re: Docker images on download page?

From: "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Docker images on download page?
Date: 2021-11-09 14:46:17
Message-ID: 9824e100-2df5-ad83-9d55-183421a34573@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On 11/9/21 9:13 AM, Dave Page wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 2:12 PM Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org
> <mailto:justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>> wrote:
>
> Hi us ;),
>
> Looking through our Downloads page, there doesn't appear
> to be a super obvious "Docker" image to point people at.
>
> eg, the OS list has:
>
>    * Linux
>    * macOS
>    * Windows
>    * BSD
>    * Solaris
>
> Should we add Docker there too (with useful info), as it's
> kind of OS agnostic?
>
> Or am I just not noticing something obvious? :)
>
> For reference, there are PG docker images which seem to be
> well regarded (AFAIK):
>
> https://hub.docker.com/_/postgres <https://hub.docker.com/_/postgres>
>
>
> That is something I've considered as well, though I've yet to do
> anything about it.
>
> As a point of reference, Docker seems to be by far the most popular way
> to deploy pgAdmin these days.

There is a "Sponsored Resources" section on the page that gives me cause
for pause. I don't believe any of the other download pages that we link
to offsite include 3rd party sponsored resources.

I think this also goes back to the open question of adding the AIX
downloads and setting up some evaluation criteria of what we look for if
we're linking offsite for "official" Postgres downloads.

Thanks,

Jonathan

In response to

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nils Andre 2021-11-09 22:57:34 Re: [PATCH] Improve portability of pgweb/load_initial_data.sh
Previous Message Dave Page 2021-11-09 14:13:58 Re: Docker images on download page?