Re: Implementation of gtrgm_out for gevel

From: Dmitry Lazurkin <dilaz03(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Implementation of gtrgm_out for gevel
Date: 2017-11-24 13:06:18
Message-ID: 980a5e10-285c-32ff-1555-16fda5a31ac8@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 11/23/2017 09:58 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Dmitry Lazurkin <dilaz03(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> Datum
>> gtrgm_out(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
>> {
>>     GISTENTRY  *entry = (GISTENTRY *) PG_GETARG_POINTER(0); /* I think entry is pointer to bad memory */
> The argument is TRGM *, I think ... certainly not GISTENTRY *.
>
> regards, tom lane

You are right. Thank you.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message hmidi slim 2017-11-24 14:48:48 Re: Buffers option
Previous Message Luca Ferrari 2017-11-24 12:46:35 Re: Buffers option