Re: [HACKERS] OK to send e-mail?

From: ocie(at)paracel(dot)com
To: tih+mail(at)Hamartun(dot)Priv(dot)NO (Tom Ivar Helbekkmo)
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] OK to send e-mail?
Date: 1998-05-05 17:06:07
Message-ID: 9805051706.AA02326@dolomite.paracel.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Ivar Helbekkmo wrote:
>
> list(at)listme(dot)com writes:
>
> > OK to send an e-mail to pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org?
>
> Intruder alert!
>
> Could someone forge an error reply to that message, so that our list
> doesn't get put on their spam list? (And, of course, if someone could
> track them down physically and break their legs, so much the better!)
>
> Actually, now that this has started, the proper way to go may be to
> start blocking postings to the lists from anyone not on them. On the
> down side, this means that people must send their postings from the
> address they're subscribed as.

Why don't we make it known (In the periodic developers FAQ posting?)
that we do not accept unsolicited email and that we will charge a fee
($50 per line per subscriber :). I for one would be more than happy
to do the detective work to track these down. As for what to do with
the money -- perhaps we should see how much we get first.

If we want to do this, we should pick some price and mention it in our
FAQ.

Ocie

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message AliE 1998-05-05 17:18:11 RE: [HACKERS] Postgres 6.3 still has problem with the index
Previous Message Jackson, DeJuan 1998-05-05 17:04:17 RE: [QUESTIONS] Pre-Estimating Penalty for variable length fields