Re: taking stdbool.h into use

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: taking stdbool.h into use
Date: 2017-11-04 16:21:24
Message-ID: 97f3b519-16bb-a619-3e27-52f8f1fb88e6@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 10/29/17 08:50, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 9:25 AM, Peter Eisentraut
> <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> Here is an updated patch set. This is just a rebase of the previous
>> set, no substantial changes. Based on the discussion so far, I'm
>> proposing that 0001 through 0007 could be ready to commit after review,
>> whereas the remaining two need more work at some later time.
>
> I had a look at this patch series. Patches 1, 2 (macos headers indeed
> show that NSUNLINKMODULE_OPTION_NONE is set to 0x0), 3 to 7 look fine
> to me.

Committed 1, 2, 3; will work on the rest later and incorporate your
findings.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2017-11-04 16:23:36 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Account for catalog snapshot in PGXACT->xmin updates.
Previous Message Daniel Verite 2017-11-04 14:59:41 Re: Dynamic result sets from procedures