From: | tushar <tushar(dot)ahuja(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Dipesh Pandit <dipesh(dot)pandit(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Jeevan Ladhe <jeevan(dot)ladhe(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: refactoring basebackup.c |
Date: | 2022-01-27 17:08:15 |
Message-ID: | 97b377c3-15b9-517f-1fca-8b4150978e91@enterprisedb.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 1/27/22 10:17 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> Cool. I committed that patch.
Thanks , Please refer to this scenario where the label is set to 0 for
server-gzip but the directory is still compressed
[edb(at)centos7tushar bin]$ ./pg_basebackup -t server:/tmp/11 --gzip
--compress=0 -Xnone
NOTICE: all required WAL segments have been archived
[edb(at)centos7tushar bin]$ ls /tmp/11
16384.tar backup_manifest base.tar
[edb(at)centos7tushar bin]$ ./pg_basebackup -t server:/tmp/10 --gzip
--compress=server-gzip:0 -Xnone
NOTICE: all required WAL segments have been archived
[edb(at)centos7tushar bin]$ ls /tmp/10
16384.tar.gz backup_manifest base.tar.gz
0 is for no compression so the directory should not be compressed if we
mention server-gzip:0 and both these
above scenarios should match?
--
regards,tushar
EnterpriseDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2022-01-27 17:42:39 | Re: refactoring basebackup.c |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2022-01-27 16:47:47 | Re: refactoring basebackup.c |