| From: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Finer Extension dependencies |
| Date: | 2012-03-29 19:00:03 |
| Message-ID: | 97F9BDE6-D787-4C57-B2D0-CFEA84347B9E@justatheory.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mar 29, 2012, at 11:48 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> Frankly, I'm not sure we bet on the right horse in not mandating a
> version numbering scheme from the beginning. But given that we
> didn't, we probably don't want to get too forceful about it too
> quickly. However, we could ease into it by documenting a recommended
> numbering scheme and making features like version-dependencies work
> only when that scheme is used.
PGXN mandates semantic versions for this reason (currently v1.0.0):
http://semver.org/spec/v1.0.0.html
Removes all the ambiguity.
David
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2012-03-29 19:07:25 | Re: Finer Extension dependencies |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2012-03-29 18:48:53 | Re: Finer Extension dependencies |