Re: increasing the default WAL segment size

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Beena Emerson <memissemerson(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, tushar <tushar(dot)ahuja(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Prabhat Sahu <prabhat(dot)sahu(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: increasing the default WAL segment size
Date: 2017-03-22 12:58:18
Message-ID: 9795723f-b4dd-f9e9-62e4-ddaf6cd888f1@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 3/22/17 05:44, Beena Emerson wrote:
> As stated above, the default 16MB has not changed and so we can take
> this separately and not as part of this patch.

It's good to have that discussion separately, but if we're planning to
do it for PG10 (not saying we should), then we should have that
discussion very soon. Especially if we would be shipping a default
configuration where the mapping of files to LSNs fails, which will
require giving users some time to adjust.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2017-03-22 13:00:07 Metadata about relation creation & full scans.
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-03-22 12:55:07 Re: Monitoring roles patch