Re: WIP: About CMake v2

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Yury Zhuravlev <u(dot)zhuravlev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WIP: About CMake v2
Date: 2016-09-18 00:12:54
Message-ID: 979184c0-d840-60ca-b9c1-fe5823492f63@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 9/16/16 9:33 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> I am no cmake guru yet, but VPATH builds are supported out of the box,
> which is cool.
>
> Your patch recommends to build with cmake after creating build/, now I
> would expect most users to run cmake from the root folder.

My understanding is that cmake strongly recommends building in a
separate directory, which is usually a subdirectory named something like
"build". So the above is likely going to be the standard workflow.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2016-09-18 03:54:48 Re: Parallel sec scan in plpgsql
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2016-09-17 23:44:53 Re: [bug fix] pg_recvlogical is missing in the Windows installation